Re: about the eofunc_Wrap

From: Dennis Shea <shea_at_nyahnyahspammersnyahnyah>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:52:35 -0600

I just ran a test on my MAC.
There were no problems and the script returned
the (different) correct results for the covariance
and correlation options.

Xuguang Sun wrote:
> Dear everyone,
>
> I'm now using eofunc_Wrap to do EOF analysis, according to the description of this function, I can use optEOF_at_jopt to determine whether covariance matrix or correlation matrix is used in eofunc_Wrap. However, it seems to me the results are exactly same from the two methods after I do it like the followings,
>
> optEOF = True
> optEOF_at_jopt = 1 ;correlation matrix
> eof= eofunc_Wrap(x,neof,optEOF)
>
> optEOF = True
> optEOF_at_jopt = 0 ;covariance matrix
> eof= eofunc_Wrap(x,neof,optEOF)
>
> I don't know what happened, could anybody say anything about that? Thanks.
>
>
>
> SUN Xuguang
>
> School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University
> 22 Hankou Road, Nanjing 210093
> China
> Tel: +86-025-83597203 (O)
> Email: sunxg007_at_yahoo.com.cn
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> 好玩贺卡等你发,邮箱贺卡全新上线!
> http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Sun Aug 16 2009 - 13:52:35 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 17 2009 - 14:39:26 MDT