Hi,
I would like to point out a bug-looking change on rcm2points_Wrap
between versions 5.1.1 and 5.2.0.
ncl-5.1.1
function rcm2points_Wrap \
(xi[*][*]:numeric,yi[*][*]:numeric, fi:numeric \
,xo[*]:numeric,yo[*]:numeric, Opt)
[snip]
fo = rcm2rgrid_points (xi,yi,fi, wrapX, xo,yo, Opt) ; perform
interpolation
[...]
ncl-5.2.0
function rcm2points_Wrap \
(yi[*][*]:numeric,xi[*][*]:numeric, fi:numeric \
,yo[*]:numeric,xo[*]:numeric, Opt)
[snip]
fo = rcm2points (xi,yi,fi, xo,yo, Opt) ; perform interpolation
[...]
According to the on-line documentation
http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Functions/Built-in/rcm2points.shtml
http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Functions/Contributed/rcm2points_Wrap.shtml
the arguments of both rcm2points_Wrap and rcm2points follow the same order:
lat2d[*][*]:numeric,lon2d[*][*]:numeric,fi:numeric,
lat[*]:numeric,lon[*]:numeric,Option:numeric
so I do not see the reason for swapping xi/yi and xo/yo between
rcm2points_Wrap and rcm2points on the 5.2.0 version of rcm2points_Wrap.
Is this a bug? or is the on-line documentation wrong?
Pleas help me to make sense of this.
Thanks,
Álvaro.
-- Álvaro M. Valdebenito B., Dr. rer. nat. alvaro.valdebenito@met.no Air Pollution Section/Research Department Tel. +47-2296 3397 Norwegian Meteorological Institute http:\\www.met.no P.O. Box 43 Blindern, 0313 Oslo, NORWAY http:\\www.emep.int/CWF _______________________________________________ ncl-talk mailing list List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe: http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talkReceived on Thu May 6 01:49:41 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 07 2010 - 10:36:00 MDT