Re: obj_anal_ic

Hi Ángel,

It looks like you have run across a deprecated version. I had
forgotten about the "contributed.ncl" version of "obj_anal_ic".

Dennis will need to answer, but the main difference is that
"obj_anal_ic" was an NCL script in V5.1.0, and then
in V5.2.0 it was changed into a built-in function.

--Mary

On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Ángel G. Muñoz wrote:

> Hi Haley, thanks for the quick answer.
>
> You can take a look to
>
> http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Functions/Contributed/obj_anal_ic.shtml
>
> Indeed, it seems that it was available in version 5.1.0. The issue
> is that it is different in version 5.2.0.
>
> Do you have any advise? I need to know what is the new algorithm.
>
> Thanks again
>
> Ángel
>
> Mary Haley escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The obj_anal_ic routine wasn't available until version 5.2.0, so
>> I'm not sure what you mean by using it in version 5.1.0.
>>
>> When you type "ncl -V" with the ncl that appears to be working,
>> does it actually say "5.1.0"?
>>
>> --Mary
>>
>> On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Ángel G. Muñoz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there
>>>
>>> Can anyone explain me what is the new algorithm for the
>>> obj_anal_ic(_Wrap) function in version 5.2. I have been using the
>>> one in 5.1.0 (which corresponds to a Cressman analysis) and there
>>> are differences in the final output. I want to understand the new
>>> methodology.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> <agmunoz.vcf>_______________________________________________
>>> ncl-talk mailing list
>>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>>
>>
>>
> <agmunoz.vcf>

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Tue Jul 6 11:48:45 2010