Re: wrf_helicity function

Piotr,

Do you have the WRF helicity code from RIP4? The wrf helicity code in NCL was
tested by the people who gave me the original Fortran code, so my feeling is that
there may be a misunderstanding on the input or output units.

--Mary

On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Piotr Djaków wrote:

> 2010/10/25 Piotr Djaków <pdjakow@gmail.com>:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Did anyone try wrf_helicity function? I've noticed that this function
>> give me very low values instead of my old GrADS functions. In fact
>> these values are too low for some cases i calculated.
>>
>> I've read that function wrf_helicity return value in:
>>
>> return_val@units = "m-2/s-2"
>> http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Functions/Built-in/wrf_helicity.shtml
>>
>> It the same units as m**2/s**2? If not, then how to change it?
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>
> Finally i succefully compiled RIP4. And i was right - RIP4 produces
> different SRH output than NCL.
> RIP and NCL results (png files) attached.
>
> I think that is something wrong with ncl wrf_helicity function...
>
> Best Regards
> Piotr
> <sreh15.png><SRH3.000016.png>_______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Tue Oct 26 09:48:29 2010