Re: calculating laplacian in NCL

From: Dennis Shea <shea_at_nyahnyahspammersnyahnyah>
Date: Wed Feb 29 2012 - 20:54:08 MST

This is not clear. What is lap.f90?

What does printVarSummary(...) of the input variable show?

Include a *clean* version of your compute code/

On 2/28/12 5:08 PM, Mingxuan Chen wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
> Please see test results. Both figures are from same file (
> 144X90,without missing values). Figure1 is using lap.f90, second one is
> using ncl function lapsF to calculate laplacian.
> How do you evaluate the lap.f90?
> Thanks
> Mingxuan
>
> Fig1
>
>
> Fig2
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Dennis Shea wrote:
>>
>>> This is offline.
>>>
>>> Maybe someone has done it. Don't know.
>>>
>>> Attached is an old fortran subroutine that is untested.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/24/2012 10:26 AM, Mingxuan Chen wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> There are functions lapsF and lapsG to calculate laplacian in NCL,
>>>> but they don't handle missing values. How do calculate laplacian
>>>> with missing values in NCL? Did anyone already write a
>>>> function/subroutine to handle missing values?
>>>> Thank you for your help.
>>>> Mingxuan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ncl-talk mailing list
>>>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
>>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>>>
>>> <lap.f>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Wed Feb 29 20:54:18 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 05 2012 - 14:12:07 MST