Kamal,
I don't know anything about DAYMET files, so I can't answer about their differences.
Dave Allured might have some ideas there.
Meanwhile, the ESMF WRF-to-curvilinear script is mostly a convenience
script that is tailored for WRF data. Really, it's just a curvilinear-to-curvilinear script.
The script you have can easily be modifed to go from curvilinear to WRF.
I've attached a sample script that likely has some errors in it, since I haven't tried it!
--Mary
On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:57 PM, mmkamal@uwaterloo.ca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to re-grid the DAYMET data prepared using Dave's contributed
> NCL script
> (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/dave.allured/data/daymet/daymet.html)
> into WRF model grid. I can see that both data set is on curvilinear
> grid. It is stated in the "ESMF_WRF_to_curv.ncl" script's header file
> that "This is an NCL/ESMF template file for regridding from a WRF
> (curvilinear) grid to a different curvilinear grid". So, I want to
> know is there any difference between the DAYMET data prepared using
> Dave's contributed NCL script and WRF model output?
>
> I want to compare my WRF model output (dx=dy=8km) with the 1 km DAYMET
> data set. So, could you please tell me which NCL regridding script I
> should use?
>
>
> Thanks
> Kamal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 21 2013 - 11:26:43 MST