In my original script, the array "pc" (principal components) is of shape (/8,22000/). I preformed the spectral analysis for all the PCs. However, to make it easier to find out what my problem was, I modified the quoted parts in the previous mail but didn't manage to delete all the "ipc" subscripts. :-)[3] What is "ipc" subscript?
[2] what is maxlag? According to Chatfield [see esacr documentation
for reference] maxlag should not be larger than dimsizes(pc)/4.
Using this length means that the autocorrelation approach
will not yield the same information for higher freq.
maxlag = dimsizes(pc)/5It's true that the first order Markov process is not consistent with my spectrum. The AR(3) process fits much better. (I haven't yet tried any orders higher than 3). Even if I take the spectrum of the fitted AR(3) process as reference, which seems to fit quite well to my spectrum obtained by applying "specx_anal" directly to the original time series, the situation seems different if I use the auto-correlation coefficients (Figure 2 of the attachment). I thought the two figures should be similar and wondered if I have make some mistakes in getting the reference curves in Figure 2. That was why I sent the previous e-mail.Well, when I look at the black dots ... I'd say your spectrum is not consistent with a first order Markov process.
_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
ncl-talk_at_ucar.edu
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 21 2005 - 17:26:33 MST