To whom it may concern:
  I am curious about the contour plot for Lambert conformal conic
projection. The following is the necessary information to supply to
the ncl script. However, there is
another parameter:central latitude. As you know, when we do
projection, we need to supply:
Parallel1,
Parallel2,
central meridian,
central latitude.
I just wonder there may be some error if we don't supply centeral
latitude. I am curious how the ncl program know where is the central
latitude. I guess it might use
the average of Parallel1 and  Parallel2. But this is not always true.
  res@mpProjection                      = "LambertConformal"
  res@mpLambertParallel1F               = file1->Latin
  res@mpLambertParallel2F               = file1->Latin
  res@mpLambertMeridianF                = file1->Lov
Today, I am trying to use wrf_ll_to_ij to find the location of the
observational site. But it seemed there is about one grid shift compared the
way I use before. I assume the method I use before is correct. I am not sure
whether the difference may result from the central latitude issue.
 opt@MAP_PROJ          = 1
   opt@TRUELAT1          =  15.0
   opt@TRUELAT2          =  40.0
   opt@STAND_LON         = 114.0
   opt@REF_LAT           = LAT(0,0,60,60)
   opt@REF_LON           = LON(0,0,60,60)
   opt@KNOWNJ            = 61
   opt@KNOWNI            = 61  ; grid number, not array number, so it is 1
not 0
   opt@DX                = 3000.
   opt@DY                = 3000.
  opt@retrunInt = True
   loc1 = wrf_ll_to_ij( 120.978, 31.0935, opt )
Thanks
Yang
_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Thu Nov 19 22:39:17 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 23 2009 - 12:24:02 MST