Re: wrf levels missing in ncl crosssection plot

From: Dennis Shea <shea_at_nyahnyahspammersnyahnyah>
Date: Mon Nov 28 2011 - 08:09:07 MST

These were created by the WRF project.
This email is being forwarded to wrfhelp@ucar.edu

On 11/28/11 4:32 AM, Thomas Langkamp wrote:
> Dear NCL-Team,
>
> I ran WRF with 60 eta levels and did some plots with this ncl-crosssection-script:
>
> http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/OnLineTutorial/Graphics/NCL/Examples/CROSS_SECTION/wrf_CrossSection4.htm
>
> In the plot the data begins at a height of 300 meters, but I know that there is (for
> some parts of the domain) data down to 40 meters, because I can see it using this
> script, displaying height-levels:
>
> http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/OnLineTutorial/Graphics/NCL/Examples/LEVELS_INTERP/wrf_Height.htm
>
> Is there a restriction within the first script, that it can only display levels of that
> have no missing values? If so, how can I circumvent it?
> But even if there is this restriction, then the displayed data should go down to ca. 180
> meters representing the highest hill in the domain.
>
> Thanks for any hint!
> Thomas
_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Mon Nov 28 08:09:14 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 30 2011 - 19:52:47 MST