Re: relative humidity

From: Shineng Hu <shineng.hu_at_nyahnyahspammersnyahnyah>
Date: Fri Feb 15 2013 - 15:18:00 MST

Hi Dennis,

Thank you for sending me the code. It is really helpful.

Shineng

2013/2/15 Dennis Shea <shea@ucar.edu>

> Attached is the single precision code used by NCL for 'relhum'.
> This was taken from an old model post processor. It was kept
> to maintain backward compatibility with previous results.
>
> http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/**Document/Functions/Built-in/**relhum.shtml<http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Functions/Built-in/relhum.shtml>
>
> Note the reference if you want details.
> ==============================**==============================**====
> Someone else will have to provide the 'wrf_hm' code.
> ==============================**==============================**====
>
>
>
>
> On 2/15/13 9:05 AM, Shineng Hu wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I am now trying to calculate the relative humidity from the output of SAM
>> model (one kind of cloud resolving model). I found there were two
>> functions
>> in NCL, 'relhum' and 'wrf_hm'. I found the results from them were the same
>> below 500mb, but were quite different above 500mb. Does anyone know the
>> difference between these two functions? Or which one is more appropriate
>> in
>> my case? Thank you!
>>
>> Best,
>> Shineng
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> ncl-talk mailing list
>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/**mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk<http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk>
>>
>>

-- 
*
*
*Hu Shineng*
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences,
School of Physics,
Peking University

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Fri Feb 15 15:18:16 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 21 2013 - 11:26:43 MST