Re: wrf CAPE function

From: Mary Haley <haley_at_nyahnyahspammersnyahnyah>
Date: Mon Oct 14 2013 - 08:50:15 MDT

Hi Nicole,

This is a good question, but ncl-talk is probably not the best place to ask this. I've CC'ed wrfhelp@ucar.edu.

I admit that I don't know if CAPE could have ever return values that were less than 0, but weren't considered out-of-range. I can see how this would be an issue.

--Mary

On Oct 13, 2013, at 10:55 AM, "Gaynor, Nicole June Schiffer" <nschiff2@illinois.edu> wrote:

> Since the assigned value for CAPE<0 is now a missing value, is there a way to tell the difference between a missing value and a CAPE value of less than zero?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicole
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> * Nicole J S Gaynor
> * Department of Atmospheric Sciences
> * University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
> * Email: nschiff2 [at] illinois [dot] edu
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Mon Oct 14 08:50:26 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 22 2013 - 10:35:27 MDT