Re: about the accuracy of the lat /lon displayed by wrf_contour

Hi, Mary,
When I was preparing my stuff (to obtain the most reduced set of them with the reported problem) to ftp to you,
I found I misunderstood the format of the displayed lat and lon and made a false alarm.
I apologize for this, though I'm glad I finally found the problem during the process of seeking help from here.
Your kindness in willing to help is appreciated.
Best wishes,
Ting


> Subject: Re: [ncl-talk] about the accuracy of the lat /lon displayed by wrf_contour
> From: haley@ucar.edu
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:45:25 -0700
> CC: ncl-talk@ucar.edu
> To: leiting2002@hotmail.com
>
> Dear Ting Lei,
>
> There's not enough information here to determine why your contours are not in the correct location.
>
> You are using an older version of NCL which *might* be the problem, but without seeing your data or your script, I can't be sure.
>
> Also, I don't know if you are using the projection provided on the WRF map file, or your own projection. I do know for some WRF plots, the center longitude for lambert conformal projections might have been wrong, if the wrong center longitude was being used.
>
> Are you able to provide us with your script and data? If so, see our ftp information:
>
> http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/report_bug.shtml#HowToFTP
>
> --Mary
>
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 12:07 PM, À×öª <leiting2002@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear Ncl users,
> > Maybe I should ask this question to wrf help system.
> > However, when I have been given wonderful answers/solutions here,
> > I still hope experts on this maillist will give some helpful comments/suggestions.
> > My problem is that I found the location of the storms will be different, in terms of the lat and lon shown in ncl figure and the display by grads.
> > The data used by the grads is from the conversion by the ARWpost.exe ( which also gave the description grads file) of the original netcdf wrf file used by ncl (ncl 6.0.0).
> > The original netcdf wrf output is on the grids of 2 km horizontal spacing.
> > in the ncl figure, the fields seems to be dislocated 0.1 degree to the south and 0.2 degree to the east.
> >
> > To plot the ncl figure, I used : wrf_getvar, wrf_user_intrp3d,wrf_contour.
> > Because I 'm doing an oneob test, I'm "able" to tell the plotting of the ncl gave a "wrong" location of the storm.
> > I only give the above "general " information for I don't want to give all the apparent details ( cause a waste of your time in viewing them) before I dig deeper on my side and give more specific details.
> > Your comments/suggestions/guesses are appreciated.
> > Best wishes,
> > Ting Lei
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ncl-talk mailing list
> > List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>
                                               

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Mon Feb 10 13:16:37 2014