Re: Mis-plotted geopolitical boundaries

From: Mary Haley <haley_at_nyahnyahspammersnyahnyah>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 09:05:05 -0700 (MST)

Hi Jack,

This is not a known problem. Can you provide the the script
and the data so we can run it here and take a look? You can
just email me this information personally.

Thanks,

--Mary

-------------------------------------------------
Mary Haley haley_at_ucar.edu
NCAR/CISL/VETS 303-497-1254 (voice)
1850 Table Mesa Dr 303-497-1239 (fax)
Boulder, CO 80305
-------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jack Glendening wrote:

> In doing high-resolution (4km) WRF runs I've noticed that the
> geopolitical boundary plotted for Great Britain is shifted eastward by
> roughly 9 km from its actual location. This is confirmed by plotting
> the WRF land-sea mask and noting it agrees with the true lat-lons of the
> coastal boundary, whereas the geopolitical boundary does not. An
> example for the Isle of Man can be viewed at
>
> http://www.drjack.info/RASP/greatbritain/wrf_LANDMASK.d2.raster.isleofman.png
>
> where land is in purple and the geopolitical boundary is the thick
> dashed line (with model terrain the thin solid line) - but this is also
> the case for the entire Great Britain mainland.
>
> Is this a known problem? Is there a fix? I am using NCL version
> 4.2.0.a034
>
> Jack
>
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> ncl-talk_at_ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>
_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
ncl-talk_at_ucar.edu
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Mon Dec 04 2006 - 09:05:05 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 05 2006 - 13:29:24 MST