Re: "Nested too deeply" error without any nesting

Hi Jack,

Is it possible for you to send us a stripped down script that
illustrates the problem
you are having? FYI, the maximum include depth has always been set to
20. Apparently NCL thinks it is nesting loads within loads, even if
that is
not what you are doing. So there is probably a bug somewhere. It would
be easiest to fix it if we have a sample of the problem though.
  -dave

On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Jack Glendening wrote:

> I had an NCL file containing numerous "load" statements, many within a
> DO loop which looped to plot many different parameters, which worked
> without any problems. I then needed to apply the statements in those
> "loaded" files (which did not contain procedures/functions) only in
> certain cases so I replaced each "load" with "loadscript" within an IF
> test. That bombed after the 18th parameter with an "Includes nested
> too deeply" error message. None of the loaded files calls the other,
> i.e. there is no nesting of the loads - in fact, for testing I can make
> all the loaded files emply files and still get the same error. I can
> run the program for the parameter at which bombs individually, sans
> loop, without any error. This leads me to wonder whether the error
> might result from the large number of "loadscript"s which are being
> called rather from any nesting. Do you have any guidance on this?
>
> FYI I do have a workaround - I simply reverted to the use of "load"
> and put the IF test within the loaded files, but there are reasons for
> preferring to put the IF test within the NCL script, not in the loaded
> files.
>
> I'm running NCL version 4.2.0.a034
>
> Jack
>
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> ncl-talk_at_ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
ncl-talk_at_ucar.edu
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Wed Jul 11 2007 - 11:02:11 MDT