Mary Haley <haley_at_ucar.edu> schrieb am 06/17/2008 12:46:54 AM:
> Jan,
>
> Setting res_at_vpWidthF seems to work for me when I call wrf_contour, but
> I also had to set the res_at_vpXF resource to 0.07 to shift it closer to
> the left side to make room for a wider plot.
Mary,
Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately it does not work for me.
> Are you just calling wrf_contour, or other plotting routines as well,
> like wrf_overlay?
I'm also calling wrf_map_overlay after wrf_contour. I tried tweaking
vpWidthF and vpXF as can be seen in the uploaded script and outputs:
http://bi.offis.uni-oldenburg.de/wrf_contour/
Setting vpXF=0.0 and vpWidthF=1.0 didn't help. Passing the same resource
(instead of False) to wrf_map_overlay had no effect either.
I have general trouble understanding how the width of the plot (e.g., in
PostScript points) is calculated by NCL - all the vpXXX coordinates and
dimensions are relative to the "plotting device space", but what
determines how wide the whole plotting device is? I tried setting
type_at_wkDeviceUpperX = 1000 when initializing the workstation, but it
didn't change anything.
Regards,
Jan Ploski
Received on Thu Jun 19 2008 - 09:57:36 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 19 2008 - 16:27:49 MDT