Re: wrf_cape_2d and rip_cape_2d

Thank you Mary, I have adapted my scripts to use wrf_cape_2d function.

Best regards,

Mateus

2009/10/5 Mary Haley <haley@ucar.edu>

> Hi Mateus,
>
> I noticed this had gone unanswered, so I pinged the wrfhelp folks
> about this. The response is just that the rip*xxxx functions have a
> bug in them, and they recommend people use the wrf_cape_xx functions.
>
> So, yes, there are differences between the two. Don't use the rip_xxx
> ones anymore.
>
> --Mary
>
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Mateus Teixeira wrote:
>
> Dear NCL users,
>>
>> Are there differences between wrf_cape_2d and rip_cape_2d algorithm?
>> I have used rip_cape_2d some time ago and saw only now that it is
>> considered obsolete in newer versions of NCL.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mateus da Silva Teixeira
>> Meteorologista
>> Instituto de Pesquisas Meteorológicas - IPMet
>> Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
>> Av. Luis Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01 - Cx. Postal 281 - CEP 17033-360
>> Bauru - SP - Brasil
>> Fone: +55 14 3103-6030 / fax: 3203-3649
>>
>> Registered Linux User #466740 (http://counter.li.org/)
>> _______________________________________________
>> ncl-talk mailing list
>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>>
>

-- 
Mateus da Silva Teixeira
Meteorologista
Instituto de Pesquisas Meteorológicas - IPMet
Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
Av. Luis Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01 - Cx. Postal 281 - CEP 17033-360
Bauru - SP - Brasil
Fone: +55 14 3103-6030 / fax: 3203-3649
Registered Linux User #466740 (http://counter.li.org/)