Re: wrf_cape_2d and rip_cape_2d

Hi Mateus,

I noticed this had gone unanswered, so I pinged the wrfhelp folks
about this. The response is just that the rip*xxxx functions have a
bug in them, and they recommend people use the wrf_cape_xx functions.

So, yes, there are differences between the two. Don't use the rip_xxx
ones anymore.

--Mary

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Mateus Teixeira wrote:

> Dear NCL users,
>
> Are there differences between wrf_cape_2d and rip_cape_2d algorithm?
> I have used rip_cape_2d some time ago and saw only now that it is
> considered obsolete in newer versions of NCL.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> --
> Mateus da Silva Teixeira
> Meteorologista
> Instituto de Pesquisas Meteorológicas - IPMet
> Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
> Av. Luis Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01 - Cx. Postal 281 - CEP 17033-360
> Bauru - SP - Brasil
> Fone: +55 14 3103-6030 / fax: 3203-3649
>
> Registered Linux User #466740 (http://counter.li.org/)
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Mon Oct 05 2009 - 13:32:03 MDT