Re: calculating laplacian in NCL

Hi Dennis,
    Please see test results. Both figures are from same file ( 144X90,without missing values). Figure1 is using lap.f90, second one is using ncl function lapsF to calculate laplacian.
   How do you evaluate the lap.f90?
   Thanks
Mingxuan

Fig1

Fig2

  
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Dennis Shea wrote:
>
>> This is offline.
>>
>> Maybe someone has done it. Don't know.
>>
>> Attached is an old fortran subroutine that is untested.
>>
>>
>> On 02/24/2012 10:26 AM, Mingxuan Chen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> There are functions lapsF and lapsG to calculate laplacian in NCL, but they don't handle missing values. How do calculate laplacian with missing values in NCL? Did anyone already write a function/subroutine to handle missing values?
>>> Thank you for your help.
>>> Mingxuan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ncl-talk mailing list
>>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>>
>> <lap.f>
>

_______________________________________________
ncl-talk mailing list
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
Received on Tue Feb 28 17:09:02 2012